programming,

Quantum Computing: Programming the Quantum Dice

Bobby Corpus Bobby Corpus Follow Jan 12, 2019 · 9 mins read
Quantum Computing: Programming the Quantum Dice
Share this

The power of quantum computing comes from the superposition of states which allows us to do computation in parallel. From an input of 1 qubit, we can do parallel computation of 2 integers (0 and 1). From an input of 2 qubits, we can do parallel computation of 4 numbers (0, 1, 2, 3) and so on. In general, for an $n$ number, we can do parallel computation of $2^n$;

A quantum computer allows us to simulate easily the roll of a dice. Imagine, for the sake of simplicity, say we have a 4-faced honest die with faces 0, 1, 2 ,3. Since there are 4 faces, the probability of getting any face is 1/4.

Using the quantum circuit below, we can show the probabilities using a quantum computer.

The circuit is constructed very easily and in my opinion is the hello work of quantum computing. We start with 2 qubits. Each qubit is initialized to 0. Then using a Hadamard gate, we can create a superposition of all states from 0 to 3:

The hadamard gates action on the qubits gives you this state:

\[\displaystyle \mathbf{H}^{\otimes n} |0\rangle = \displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}^n} \sum_{x=0}^{2^n-1} |x\rangle\]

Then doing a measurement on the circuits 1000 times we get a probability distribution. The graph below shows that the probability of getting any state is more of less the same.

2-Dice Game

What if we toss 2 dice and get the sum of the faces that show up? The following numbers are the possible outcomes: 0, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6. What number are you going to bet on to maximize your winnings? If we plot a table of possible outcomes, we would end up with the following table:

\[\begin{array}{|c|cccc|} \hline & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3\\\hline 0 & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3\\ 1 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4\\ 2 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\\ 3 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6\\\hline \end{array}\]

We can see that the sum = 3 has a much greater probability of coming up compared to any other number. In fact, the sum 3 comes up 4 times out of 16, which means that the probability of getting a sum of 3 is 4/16 or 0.25.

We can also show the same probability distribution using quantum computing.

2-Qubit Addition Circuit

First we need to create a circuit for adding two 2-qubit numbers. Do do this, we can use of the full-adder circuit for adding 1 bit numbers:

The $a_0$ and $b_0$ refer to the input qubits, the $C_{\mathrm{i}0}$ refer to the input carry bit from the addition of the lesser significant bit. The $s_0$ refer to the sum of the 2 bits. The $C_{\mathrm{o}0}$ refer to the carry bit of the current addition operation and will be input to the addition of the next significant bit. For more information about binary adders refer to this wikipedia article.

Since there are two bits we need to add, we need two of these circuits stringed together as shown below:

[caption id=”attachment_3280” align=”aligncenter” width=”660”] Figure 3: Two Full Adders to add 2-Qubit Numbers[/caption]

Translating to a Quantum Circuit

Using the circuit diagram above, we can translate it to a quantum circuit by using the following rules:

  1. For each input bit in the XOR gate, create a CNOT gate such that the input of the CNOT gate is the input bit and the target is the output of the XOR gate:

  1. For each AND gate, create a Control-Control-NOT gate (also known as Toffoli gate) such that the input bits of the Control-Control-NOT gate is the input bits of the AND gate and the target bit is the output bit of the AND gate.

Using these 2 rules, we can translate Figure 3 to the following quantum circuit:

Simulating the 2-dice Betting Game

Now that we have created the adder circuit, we can now use quantum computing to simulate the betting game. Thanks to the Hadamard gate, it’s very easy to create a superposition of states from the input qubits. We only have to apply hadamards to each input qubit. The full quantum circuit is now shown below:

Here is the QISKit code to do this:

# Import the Qiskit SDK
from qiskit import QuantumCircuit, ClassicalRegister, QuantumRegister
from qiskit import execute, Aer
from qiskit.tools.visualization import circuit_drawer, plot_histogram

# Create an input Quantum Registers
qa = QuantumRegister(2, name="a")
qb = QuantumRegister(2, name="b")

# Create the intermediate registers
qci = QuantumRegister(1, name="ci")
qco = QuantumRegister(1, name="co")
qd0 = QuantumRegister(3, name="d0")
qd1 = QuantumRegister(3, name="d1")

# Create the output registers

qs = QuantumRegister(3, name="s")

# Create a Classical Register with 3 bits.
c = ClassicalRegister(3, name="cl")
# Create a Quantum Circuit
qc = QuantumCircuit(qa, qb, qci, qco, qd0, qd1, qs, c)



# Flip the output qubit and apply Hadamard gate.
qc.h(qa[0])
qc.h(qa[1])
qc.h(qb[0])
qc.h(qb[1])

qc.barrier()
# The addition circuit

qc.cx(qa[0],qd0[0])
qc.cx(qb[0],qd0[0])
qc.cx(qd0[0],qs[0])
qc.cx(qci[0],qs[0])


qc.ccx(qci[0],qd0[0],qd0[1])
qc.ccx(qa[0],qb[0],qd0[2])
qc.cx(qd0[1],qco[0])
qc.cx(qd0[2],qco[0])

#### 2nd bit
qc.cx(qa[1],qd1[0])
qc.cx(qb[1],qd1[0])
qc.cx(qd1[0],qs[1])
qc.cx(qco[0],qs[1])

qc.ccx(qco[0],qd1[0],qd1[1])
qc.ccx(qa[1],qb[1],qd1[2])
qc.cx(qd1[1],qs[2])
qc.cx(qd1[2],qs[2])

qc.barrier()
qc.measure(qs, c)

# Compile and run the Quantum circuit on a simulator backend
backend_sim = Aer.get_backend('qasm_simulator')
shots = 100

job_sim = execute(qc, backend=backend_sim, shots=shots)
result_sim = job_sim.result()
answer = result_sim.get_counts()
plot_histogram(answer)

# Test
# 0+0 = 0 check
# 0+1 = 1 check
# 0+2 = 2 check
# 0+3 = 3 check
# 1+0 = 1 check
# 1+1 = 2 check
# 1+2 = 3 check
# 1+3 = 4 check
# 2+0 = 2 check
# 2+1 = 3 check
# 2+2 = 4 check
# 2+3 = 5 check
# 3+0 = 3 check
# 3+1 = 4 check
# 3+2 = 5 check
# 3+3 = 6 check

As usual, the code for drawing the circuit is as follows:

from qiskit.tools.visualization import matplotlib_circuit_drawer as drawer, qx_color_scheme
my_scheme=qx_color_scheme()
my_scheme['plotbarrier'] = False
drawer(qc, style=my_scheme)

And here’s the resulting probability distribution generated for 50 simulation runs.

Why it Works

Suppose we have 2 n-qubit numbers. We apply superposition of states to both numbers and an Identity to the output qubit:

\[\mathbf{H}^{\otimes n}\otimes \mathbf{H}^{\otimes n}\otimes \mathbf{I} |0\rangle |0\rangle |0\rangle\]

to get

\[\displaystyle \Big(\displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}^n} \sum_{x=0}^{2^{n}-1} |x\rangle\Big)\otimes \Big( \displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}^n} \sum_{y=0}^{2^{n}-1} |y\rangle\Big)\otimes |0\rangle\]

Next, we apply the addition operator defined as

\[\mathrm{U}_{f} |xy\rangle |0\rangle = |xy\rangle |x+y\rangle\]

where

\[|xy\rangle = |x\rangle \otimes |y\rangle\]

to give

\[\displaystyle \frac{1}{2^n}\sum_{x=0}^{2^{n}-1} \sum_{y=0}^{2^{n}-1} \mathrm{U}_f |xy\rangle \otimes |0\rangle = \frac{1}{2^n}\sum_{x=0}^{2^{n}-1} \sum_{y=0}^{2^{n}-1} |xy\rangle \otimes |x+y\rangle\]

The right hand side can be written as:

\[\displaystyle \frac{1}{2^n}\sum_{i=0}^{2\cdot(2^n-1)}\Big(\sum_{j=0}^i|j\rangle |i-j\rangle\Big) |i\rangle\]

If we measure the output qubit, it will collapse to the state

\[\Psi = \displaystyle \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^n \sum_{j=0}^i|j\rangle |i-j\rangle\Big) |i\rangle\]

with probability

\[\Psi^*\Psi = \displaystyle \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2n} \sum_{j=0}^i 1 = (i+1) \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2n}\]

In our example, we have $n=2$, the probability of getting a sum of i=3 is:

\[\displaystyle (i+1)\cdot \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2n} = (3+1)\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{4} = 4\cdot \left(\frac{1}{16}\right) = \frac{1}{4} = 0.25\]

Conclusion

We have shown the power of quantum computing by allowing us to represent inputs as the superposition of all possible inputs to be computed in parallel. We have shown that this can be done using a Hadamard gate. Using an adder circuit we were able to modify the probabilities so that they are not evenly distributed but follow some distribution which favors some outcomes rather than others. You can just imagine what other possibilities we can use quantum computing for!

Image Credit: “Dice five” by @Doug88888 is marked with CC BY-NC-SA 2.0. To view the terms, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/?ref=openverse

Bobby Corpus
Written by Bobby Corpus Follow
Bobby is President of OneQuantum Philippines, a local chapter of OneQuantum global community. He is a Technical Architect at Section6, New Zealand and was the Innovation Lead at the Enterprise Data Office at Globe Telecoms. He was a Solution Architect at Red Hat and a Vice President and Lead Solution architect in Deutsche Bank AG, Singapore. His interest in Quantum Computing comes from his training in Theoretical Physics and Computer Science.